Exercise intensity not linked to mortality risk in older adults


Deprecated: strlen(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/medicircle/public_html/script_newsdetails.php on line 75
▴ Exercise intensity not linked to mortality risk in older adults
Exercise intensity appears to make no difference to risk of mortality among older adults, finds trial

Exercise intensity appears to make no difference to risk of mortality among older adults, suggests a randomised controlled trial from Norway published by The BMJ recently.

Physical activity has been highlighted as one of the most important actions people of all ages can engage in to improve health, and data from observational studies show that early death is significantly reduced in physically active compared with inactive individuals.

Yet high quality clinical trial evidence on a potential direct (causal) relation between current advice on physical activity levels and longevity is lacking.

So an international research team set out to evaluate the effect of five years of supervised exercise training compared with recommendations for physical activity on mortality in older adults (70-77 years).

The trial involved 1,567 participants (790 women and 777 men) living in Trondheim, Norway, with an average age of 73 years. In total, 87.5% of participants reported overall good health and 80% reported a medium or high level of physical activity at the start of the trial.

Of these 1,567 participants, 400 were assigned to two weekly sessions of high intensity interval training (HIIT), 387 were assigned to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), and 780 to follow the Norwegian guidelines for physical activity (control group), all for five years.

After five years, the overall mortality rate was 4.6% (72 participants).

The researchers found no difference in all cause mortality between the control group (4.7%, 37 participants) and combined HIIT and MICT group (4.5%, 35 participants).

They also found no differences in cardiovascular disease or cancer between the control group and the combined HIIT and MICT group.

For example, the total proportion of participants with cardiovascular disease after five years was 15.6%, with 16% (125 participants) in the control group, 15% (58 participants) in the MICT group, and 15.3% (61 participants) in the HIIT group.

The researchers point to some limitations. For example, highly active participants in the control group could have hampered finding differences between groups, and many participants were healthier than expected at the start of the study, which may have limited the potential to increase activity levels further.

However, strengths include the large number of older adults, and the long intervention period and monitoring throughout the study.

"This study suggests that combined MICT and HIIT has no effect on all cause mortality compared with recommended physical activity levels," write the researchers.

Tags : #TheBMJ #LatestPharmaNews8thOct #LatestPharmaResearch8thOct #PhysicalExercise #CardiovascularDisease #Cancer

About the Author


Team Medicircle

Related Stories

Loading Please wait...

-Advertisements-



Trending Now

CARE Hospitals to Offer Free Vascular Health Check on National Vascular DayAugust 05, 2026
Breastfeeding Myths That New Mothers Should Stop BelievingAugust 05, 2026
Why Modern Lifestyle Causes Chronic InflammationAugust 05, 2026
Endometriosis Awareness: Understanding the Silent Condition Affecting Millions of Indian WomenAugust 05, 2026
A Complete Guide to Pregnancy Health Tips for Indian Women: Nutrition, Wellness, and What Every Expectant Mother Should KnowAugust 05, 2026
Metropolis Healthcare reports strong Q1FY27 performance, with revenue up 17% to ₹450 crore and EBITDA up 27% YoYAugust 04, 2026
India's Silent Liver Health Crisis: New Data Points to Urgent Need for Screening and PreventionAugust 04, 2026
Eureka Forbes Launches 'Ghar Ka New Favourite' Campaign showcasing Forbes SmartClean Robotic Vacuum Cleaner with Shraddha KapoorAugust 04, 2026
Why Preventive Healthcare for Children Is One of the Most Important Investments India Can MakeAugust 04, 2026
The Role of Pathology in Healthcare: From Diagnosis to Disease PreventionAugust 04, 2026
Pathophysiology of Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Presentation, Joint Damage Mitigation, and BiologicsAugust 04, 2026
Comprehensive Evaluation of Syncope: Cardiac vs. Neurological Origin WorkupsAugust 04, 2026
Common Medical Terms Explained: A Plain-Language Guide for Indian Patients and Healthcare SeekersAugust 03, 2026
Why Radiology Is the Backbone of Modern Medical Diagnosis and TreatmentAugust 03, 2026
Managing Urban Stress: Science-Backed Strategies for Mental Resilience in 2026 August 01, 2026
Managing Chronic Inflammation: The Role of Anti-Inflammatory Indian SuperfoodsAugust 01, 2026
Pathophysiology of Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Presentation, Joint Damage Mitigation, and BiologicsAugust 01, 2026
Early Markers of Glaucoma: Structural vs. Functional Ophthalmic Diagnostic ProtocolsAugust 01, 2026
Managing Complex Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Multidisciplinary Wound Care, Offloading, and RevascularizationAugust 01, 2026
The Future of Preventive Medicine: How India Is Moving From Cure to PreventionAugust 01, 2026