Human health may be at risk from long-term exposure to air pollution


Deprecated: strlen(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/medicircle/public_html/script_newsdetails.php on line 75
Growing evidence that current pollution standards are insufficient and need to be revised, suggests the study

Long-term exposure to air pollution appears to still be linked to higher mortality despite the existence of air quality standards that restrict levels of pollution, suggests a study published online in The BMJ today.

Researchers found evidence of higher death rates amongst people who had been exposed to more air pollution even though the levels were allowed under current official standards.

Previous studies have found an association between long term exposure to outdoor air pollution such as those in the form of fine particles in the air (known as particulate matter or PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and poor health or death. 

Air pollution concentrations have fallen substantially in Europe since the 1990s, but it is unclear whether there still is a link between pollution and ill health or death at concentrations of pollution that are below current permitted limits.

Therefore, an international team of researchers led by the Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences at Utrecht University in the Netherlands set out to investigate if there was an association between low levels of air pollution concentrations and natural and cause-specific deaths.

Low level air pollution was defined as concentrations below current limit values as set by the European Union, US Environmental Protection Agency and the World Health Organization (WHO) air quality guidelines.

The researchers analysed data on eight groups of people within six European countries – Sweden, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Germany and Austria – totalling 325,367 adults collectively.

Their study, known as the Effects of Low-Level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe (ELAPSE) recruited participants in the 1990s or 2000s.

Of the 325,367 participants who were followed up over an almost 20-year period, around 14.5% (47,131 people) died during the study period.

Analysis of the results showed that people who had higher exposure to particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide, and black carbon were more likely to die. 

An increase of 5 µg/m3 (a concentration measure of particulate matter) in PM2.5 was associated with a 13% increase in natural deaths while the corresponding figure for a 10 µg/m3 increase in nitrogen dioxide was 8.6%. Associations with PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide were largely independent of each other.

Moreover, associations with PM2.5, nitrogen dioxide, and black carbon remained significant at low to very low concentrations.

For people who were exposed to pollution levels below the US standard of 12 µg/m3, an increase of 5 µg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with a 29.6% increase in natural deaths. People exposed to nitrogen dioxide at less than half the current EU standard of 40 µg/m3, a 10 µg/m3 increase in nitrogen dioxide was associated with a 9.9% increase in natural deaths.

This is an observational study, and as such, can’t establish cause.

The study also has some limitations, say the authors, such as the fact that it focused on exposure in 2010 which was towards the end of the follow-up period for most participants and, given the downward trend in air pollution, this measure might not exactly reflect the concentrations experienced during follow-up.

However, this was a large study from multiple European groups of people with the detailed information provided.

As such, the authors conclude: “Our study contributes to the evidence that outdoor air pollution is associated with mortality even at levels below the current European and North American standards and WHO guideline values.

“These findings are therefore an important contribution to the debate about the revision of air quality limits, guidelines and standards, and future assessments by the Global Burden of Disease [study].”

Tags : #TheBMJ #ELAPSE #PM2 #Airpollution #NitrogenOxide

About the Author


Team Medicircle

Related Stories

Loading Please wait...

-Advertisements-




Trending Now

The Great Unfollow: Why Patients Are Distrusting Influencer DoctorsJune 14, 2025
The Great Unfollow: Why Patients Are Distrusting Influencer DoctorsJune 14, 2025
Sleep Clinics Boom in Tier 2 Cities: What’s Fueling the Demand?June 14, 2025
Flight to Nowhere: The Air India Crash That Shook Ahmedabad and Raised Global Safety AlarmsJune 13, 2025
She Went for Pain Relief, Came Back With a Torn Artery: A Chiropractic Horror StoryJune 13, 2025
Biology vs Burnout: What Night Shifts Are Really Doing to Your Brain and BodyJune 13, 2025
Renowned Gynaecologist Joins Manipal Hospital Gurugram to Strengthen Women’s HealthJune 13, 2025
Aster CMI Hospital Saves Young Woman from Limb Loss in Rare Vascular SurgeryJune 13, 2025
QNET Unveils Father’s Day Gifts to Honour the Everyday Hero in Your LifeJune 13, 2025
Manipal Hospital Ghaziabad becomes first in the city to perform REZUM to treat prostate enlargementJune 13, 2025
Gen Z Doctors: Rethinking the White Coat Culture in IndiaJune 13, 2025
How Menopause Is Finally Becoming a Mainstream Medical ConversationJune 13, 2025
Thinner Bodies, Heavier Minds: When Diets Damage Mental HealthJune 13, 2025
Unite Health systems with Community-led health services to deliver on UHCJune 12, 2025
SIMS Hospital Performs India’s First Combined Open-Heart Valve Replacement and TAVR Valve-Specialised Aortic Graft SurgeryJune 12, 2025
Sodexo Partners with Medanta, Indore to Enhance Patient Dining ExperienceJune 12, 2025
University of Leeds invites applications for MSc in Air Quality Solutions with Data ScienceJune 12, 2025
IPV Leads Iom Bioworks ₹4 Cr in Seed Round to Revolutionize Healthcare Through Gut Microbiome ScienceJune 12, 2025
Rural Telehealth Fatigue: Is Screen-Based Healthcare Reaching Saturation?June 12, 2025
Medical Misinformation in the Age of Instagram: A Doctor’s DilemmaJune 12, 2025