Remdesivir useless for severe Covid-19 patients : WHO

▴ Remdesivir useless for severe Covid-19 patients : WHO
The search for effective drug continues for severely affected Covid patients

A large study led by the World Health Organization suggests that the antiviral drug remdesivir did not help hospitalized COVID-19 patients, in contrast to an earlier study that made the medicine a standard of care in the United States and many other countries.

The results announced Friday do not negate the previous ones, and the WHO study was not as rigorous as the earlier one led by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. But they add to concerns about how much value the pricey drug gives because none of the studies has found it can improve survival.

The drug has not been approved for COVID-19 in the U.S., but it was authorized for emergency use after the previous study found it shortened recovery time by five days on average. It’s approved for use against COVID-19 in the United Kingdom and Europe, and is among the treatments U.S. President Donald Trump received when he was infected earlier this month.

The WHO study involved more than 11,000 patients in 30 countries. About 2,750 were randomly assigned to get remdesivir. The rest got either the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, the immune-system booster interferon, the antiviral combo lopinavir-ritonavir, or just usual care. The other drugs have largely been ruled out for COVID-19 by previous studies, but not remdesivir.

Death rates after 28 days, the need for breathing machines and time in the hospital were relatively similar for those given remdesivir versus usual care.

The results have not been published in a journal or reviewed by independent scientists but were posted on a site researchers use to share results quickly.

“The big story is the finding that remdesivir produces no meaningful impact on survival,” Martin Landray, an Oxford University professor who led other coronavirus treatment research, said in a statement.

“This is a drug that has to be given by intravenous infusion for five to 10 days,” and costs about $2,550 per treatment course, he said. “COVID affects millions of people and their families around the world. We need scalable, affordable and equitable treatments.”

Dr. Margaret Harris, a WHO spokeswoman, attributed the difference in the conclusions of the two studies to the fact WHO's was larger.

“It’s just a much higher-powered study,” she said. “It’s quadruple the number of people in all the other studies."

However, Dr. Andre Kalil, a University of Nebraska infectious disease specialist who helped lead the U.S. remdesivir study, said the WHO one was poorly designed, which makes its conclusions less reliable. Patients and doctors knew what treatment they were using, there was no placebo infusion to help avoid biased reporting of risks or benefits, there was little information about the severity of patients' symptoms when treatments began and a lot of missing data, he said.

“Poor quality study design cannot be fixed by large sample size, no matter how large it is,” Kalil wrote in an email.

Furthermore, the WHO study tested 10 days of remdesivir, so some patients may have been hospitalized longer than they needed to be just to finish treatment, making their length of stay look bad in comparison to others getting usual care.

Remdesivir’s maker, Gilead Sciences, said in a statement that the results are inconsistent with more rigorous studies and have not been fully reviewed or published.

Tags : #Remdesivir #InterferonImmunityBooster #Lopinavirritonavir #GileadSciences #WHO #LatestCovidDrugNewsOct17

About the Author


Team Medicircle

Related Stories

Loading Please wait...

-Advertisements-




Trending Now

Moscow Researchers Develop Russia's Pioneer Lumbosacral Spine Phantom for Anesthesia Ultrasound TrainingNovember 12, 2024
World Pneumonia Day: How Pneumonia Continues to Steal Lives and What We Can Do About ItNovember 12, 2024
From Darkness to Clarity: How Stem Cell Transplants Are Offering New Hope for Corneal BlindnessNovember 12, 2024
Daytime Sleepiness and Dementia: Is Napping in the Afternoon Putting You at Risk?November 12, 2024
GET WEDDING-READY WITH KAY BEAUTY: KATRINA KAIF’S TOP PICKS FOR BRIDES & BRIDESMAIDSNovember 11, 2024
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Students Win Global All-Track Grand Prize at HackHarvard 2024 Organized by Harvard University StudentsNovember 11, 2024
Algorand Foundation Announces its Investment in 5 Startups from the Inaugural Startup Lab Program at T-HubNovember 11, 2024
DOST, DTI & DICT join forces for Philippine Startup Week 2024 to Ignite Filipino InnovationNovember 11, 2024
Firewall gender equality from threats like anti-rights Geneva Consensus DeclarationNovember 11, 2024
Delhi’s Air Crisis: How Toxic Air and Pollution Are Still Threatening Health and Life QualityNovember 11, 2024
Are You at Risk? AI Data Exposes Unseen Triggers of Diabetes in Our EnvironmentNovember 11, 2024
Why Children in High-Risk Areas Are Paying the Price for TB Neglect?November 11, 2024
The Deadly 17: WHO’s Vaccine Priority List to Tackle Life-Threatening InfectionsNovember 09, 2024
Is Your Gut Telling You Something? The Bacterial Clues to Early Rheumatoid ArthritisNovember 09, 2024
Newcastle University Announces VC Excellence Scholarships for Undergraduate and Postgraduate StudiesNovember 08, 2024
Beyond the X-ray: Celebrating the Pioneers of Radiography on World Radiography DayNovember 08, 2024
Digital Doctors and Village Heroes: Tackling Depression and Stigma in India’s HeartlandNovember 08, 2024
Why Are Food Giants Pushing ‘Low-Star’ Nutrition on Low-Income Countries?November 08, 2024
NokAir joins hands with Çelebi for world class ground handling services for newly launched Bangkok-Mumbai routeNovember 07, 2024
Why Are Rare Disease Patients Paying a Fortune When Local Production Could Save Lives?November 07, 2024