Remdesivir useless for severe Covid-19 patients : WHO

▴ Remdesivir useless for severe Covid-19 patients : WHO
The search for effective drug continues for severely affected Covid patients

A large study led by the World Health Organization suggests that the antiviral drug remdesivir did not help hospitalized COVID-19 patients, in contrast to an earlier study that made the medicine a standard of care in the United States and many other countries.

The results announced Friday do not negate the previous ones, and the WHO study was not as rigorous as the earlier one led by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. But they add to concerns about how much value the pricey drug gives because none of the studies has found it can improve survival.

The drug has not been approved for COVID-19 in the U.S., but it was authorized for emergency use after the previous study found it shortened recovery time by five days on average. It’s approved for use against COVID-19 in the United Kingdom and Europe, and is among the treatments U.S. President Donald Trump received when he was infected earlier this month.

The WHO study involved more than 11,000 patients in 30 countries. About 2,750 were randomly assigned to get remdesivir. The rest got either the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, the immune-system booster interferon, the antiviral combo lopinavir-ritonavir, or just usual care. The other drugs have largely been ruled out for COVID-19 by previous studies, but not remdesivir.

Death rates after 28 days, the need for breathing machines and time in the hospital were relatively similar for those given remdesivir versus usual care.

The results have not been published in a journal or reviewed by independent scientists but were posted on a site researchers use to share results quickly.

“The big story is the finding that remdesivir produces no meaningful impact on survival,” Martin Landray, an Oxford University professor who led other coronavirus treatment research, said in a statement.

“This is a drug that has to be given by intravenous infusion for five to 10 days,” and costs about $2,550 per treatment course, he said. “COVID affects millions of people and their families around the world. We need scalable, affordable and equitable treatments.”

Dr. Margaret Harris, a WHO spokeswoman, attributed the difference in the conclusions of the two studies to the fact WHO's was larger.

“It’s just a much higher-powered study,” she said. “It’s quadruple the number of people in all the other studies."

However, Dr. Andre Kalil, a University of Nebraska infectious disease specialist who helped lead the U.S. remdesivir study, said the WHO one was poorly designed, which makes its conclusions less reliable. Patients and doctors knew what treatment they were using, there was no placebo infusion to help avoid biased reporting of risks or benefits, there was little information about the severity of patients' symptoms when treatments began and a lot of missing data, he said.

“Poor quality study design cannot be fixed by large sample size, no matter how large it is,” Kalil wrote in an email.

Furthermore, the WHO study tested 10 days of remdesivir, so some patients may have been hospitalized longer than they needed to be just to finish treatment, making their length of stay look bad in comparison to others getting usual care.

Remdesivir’s maker, Gilead Sciences, said in a statement that the results are inconsistent with more rigorous studies and have not been fully reviewed or published.

Tags : #Remdesivir #InterferonImmunityBooster #Lopinavirritonavir #GileadSciences #WHO #LatestCovidDrugNewsOct17

About the Author


Team Medicircle

Related Stories

Loading Please wait...

-Advertisements-




Trending Now

10 PCOS Warning Signs That Need Your AttentionDecember 27, 2024
Experts Dub 2024 as the Year of Technologies and Innovations in Healthcare; Stress on further Integration of Technologies December 27, 2024
Aakash Healthcare Partners with Japan for Groundbreaking Surgical Intervention: A Global Collaboration to Revolutionize Cardiovascular CareDecember 26, 2024
Traditional Medicine Goes Global: How Ayush 2024 Reimagined WellnessDecember 26, 2024
Aster Guardians Global Nursing Award 2025 worth INR 2 Crore now open for nominations worldwide December 26, 2024
Holiday Season Round the Corner? 6 Daily Habits That Could Be The Reason Behind Your Fatty LiverDecember 26, 2024
Healing the Nation: Doctors as Architects of a Healthier FutureDecember 26, 2024
Brewing Health Benefits: Can Coffee and Tea Help Fight Head and Neck Cancers?December 26, 2024
Seven-Year-Old Fights Back Against Rare Autoimmune DiseaseDecember 26, 2024
Olympus Named to Dow Jones Sustainability World Index for the Fourth Consecutive YearDecember 26, 2024
American Oncology Institute (AOI) in Nagpur Restores Mobility with KyphoplastyDecember 26, 2024
Sanjeevani Healthcare & Wellness Expo 2024: A Dynamic Platform for Global Healthcare CollaborationDecember 23, 2024
Ranitidine: Saviour or Suspect? The Truth Behind the Stomach Acid RemedyDecember 23, 2024
From One-Size-Fits-All to Precision Medicine: The New Hope for Rare Bone Cancer PatientsDecember 23, 2024
World Meditation Day: India’s Gift of Peace to a Chaotic WorldDecember 23, 2024
Breaking New Ground in Migraine Care: A Landmark Session on Diagnosis and TreatmentDecember 23, 2024
Black Angels remind us of centuries of injustices plaguing the TB responseDecember 20, 2024
Healthcare Startups to Watch Out for in 2025December 20, 2024
Biobank Blueprint: Redefining Diabetes Diagnosis and Treatment in IndiaDecember 20, 2024
The Future of Malaria Prevention: Can This Vaccine Eliminate the Disease?December 20, 2024