Covid-19 antibodies offers protection against reinfection later, study suggests

▴ Covid-19 antibodies offers protection against reinfection later, study suggests
Study shows antibodies offer protection from coronavirus

There's new evidence that connects testing positive for Covid-19 antibodies from a prior infection with a significantly lower risk of becoming infected again in the future.

A study, published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine on Wednesday, found that people who tested positive for Covid-19 antibodies were at a decreased risk of coronavirus infection compared with those who tested negative for antibodies.
"The results from the study are basically a 10-fold reduction, but I would have caveats around that. In other words, it could be an overestimate of the reduction. It could be an underestimate of the reduction," said Dr. Douglas Lowy, principal deputy director of the National Cancer Institute, who was an author of the study.
"To me, the big message is -- there's a reduction," he said. "The main takeaway is that being antibody positive after natural infection is associated with partial protection against a new infection."

Lowy added that people who have recovered from Covid-19 should still get vaccinated when it is their turn.
Uncertainty over how much protection Covid-19 antibodies offer 02:59
The researchers -- from the National Cancer Institute and the companies LabCorp, Quest Diagnostics, Aetion Inc. and HealthVerity -- examined data on more than 3.2 million people in the United States who had completed a Covid-19 antibody test last year between January and August. Among those tested, 11.6% tested positive for Covid-19 antibodies and 88.3% tested negative.
In follow-up data, the researchers found that only 0.3% of those who tested positive for Covid-19 antibodies ended up testing positive for coronavirus infection later, beyond 90 days. Whereas, 3% of those with negative Covid-19 antibody test results were later diagnosed with coronavirus infection during that same time period.
Overall, the study is observational and it suggests there is an association between positive Covid-19 antibody test results and a lower risk of infection some 90 days later -- but more research is needed to determine a causal relationship and for how long protection from antibodies may last.
Lowy said that more research is also needed to determine the risk of reinfection from one of the emerging coronavirus variants.


"Now that there are these variants of concern, what are the implications there? The short answer is we don't know," Lowy said. He also emphasized that people who have tested positive for antibodies should still get vaccinated against Covid-19.
It's already known that most patients who recover from Covid-19 have antibodies and reinfection appears to be rare so far -- but it is still unclear for "how long antibody protection will last because of natural infection," Dr. Mitchell Katz of the NYC Health + Hospitals health care system wrote in an editorial that published alongside the new study in JAMA Internal Medicine.


"For this reason, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is recommended regardless of antibody status," Katz wrote. SARS-CoV-2 is the name of the coronavirus that causes Covid-19.
"How long the antibody protection provided by vaccines will last is also unknown," he wrote. "To know how long protection will last with antibodies because of natural infection or vaccination is something only time will tell."

Tags : #Coronavirus #CovidAntibodies #JAMAInternalMedicine #NationalCancerInstitute

About the Author


Team Medicircle

Related Stories

Loading Please wait...

-Advertisements-




Trending Now

If some countries in Asia Pacific can be on track to end AIDS then why cannot all?July 26, 2024
Karan Johar and Guneet Monga Kapoor’s 'Gyaarah Gyaarah' trailer breaks time barriers on ZEE5July 26, 2024
If some countries in Asia Pacific can be on track to end AIDS then why cannot all?July 26, 2024
Investing in India’s Path to a Healthier and Brighter FutureJuly 26, 2024
Your Medication Could Be Useless This Summer: How Heat Waves Affect Drug SafetyJuly 26, 2024
Innovative Approach to Adolescent Weight Loss: Combining Meal-Replacement Therapy with Financial IncentivesJuly 26, 2024
Promoting School Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Program in India: A Step Towards Saving LivesJuly 26, 2024
Education Budget 2024: A Step Towards Better Learning : Gargi Limaye July 25, 2024
AI assistant shows great promise in cataract care pathwayJuly 25, 2024
Publishing Powerhouse Devangini : A Force of Resilience and Empowerment in LiteratureJuly 25, 2024
Alarm rings in Asia Pacific for not making U-equals-U and HIV prevention accessible to allJuly 25, 2024
Sirnaomics Announces Completion of IND-Enabling Studies of Safety and Efficacy for STP125G with NHP Models, Targeting ApoC3 for Treatment of Cardiovascular DiseasesJuly 24, 2024
Nurturing Souls revolutionises 1000 Child-Parent Relationships for Better Career Choices & improved Mental HealthJuly 24, 2024
How to Improve Sleep Quality in Adolescents: Insights from a New StudyJuly 24, 2024
Tragic Nipah Virus Death of 14-Year-Old in Kerala: What You Need to KnowJuly 24, 2024
India Inaugurates First Overseas Jan Aushadi Kendra in MauritiusJuly 24, 2024
Budget Reaction Quote - Ms. Deepshikha Sharma, CEO, Sharp Sight Eye HospitalsJuly 23, 2024
Quote to be attributed to Mr. Jatinder Paul Singh, CEO & Co - Founder of Viacation Tourism:July 23, 2024
Budget Reaction by Anjan Bose, Founding Secretary General, NATHEALTH July 23, 2024
Mr. Niranjan Kirloskar, Managing Director, Fleetguard Filters Private Limited- BUDGET REACTIONJuly 23, 2024